Friday, November 10, 2006

Of Self-indulgent Personality Tests

So I want to see how this Johari Window thing works. But that means I need y'all to rate me here.

If you're up to criticism (and what's there to criticize?), you can also offer input on my Nohari Window.

posted by Jeremy at 6:16 PM
3 marginalia

Tuesday, October 17, 2006

Of Strange Happenings in Moscow

The April 2006 issue of Scientific American reported that in the preceding February, a graduate student from the University of Idaho rediscovered the Giant Palouse Earthworm (Driloleirus americanus) after a twenty-year disappearance. Driloleirus americanus can grow to a length of three feet, will spit in self-defense, and smells "like lillies."

This is either a sign of the Apocalypse, or the prelude to Tremors 5.

posted by Jeremy at 5:18 PM
1 marginalia

Saturday, September 09, 2006

Of a Sudden, Strange Thought

The OT Christophanies...What if they were not "pre-incarnate" appearances of Christ? What if Jesus (post-resurrection) could time-travel? He seems to do a lot of strange appearing and disappearing after his resurrection, and his eating of the fish and honeycomb with the disciples reminds me of the time the Angel of the Lord came and had dinner with Abram.

That's all I've got. Anybody else have an opinion?

posted by Jeremy at 3:55 PM
3 marginalia

Tuesday, August 22, 2006

Of Denying Natural Revelation

Or, The Regulative Principle Mutated To Gargantuan Proportions and Running Amok Through Tokyo While Spewing Radioactive Propositionalism and Stomping Reason Into Oblivion, by John Robbins

posted by Jeremy at 6:41 PM
0 marginalia

Of a Non-Evolutionist Old-Earth Calvinist

Lee Irons, The Days of Genesis (MP3)

I guess my take on Genesis 1 is not as far from the Framework Perspective as I had imagined (although I think it avoids the pitfalls of that view--perhaps I should call my version the Historicist Framework Perspective). I don't agree with everything here, I wish Irons were more Jordanesque in places, and I find the terms "literal" and "figurative" unhelpful in this discussion (I consider my own interpretation of the Genesis 1 creation days to be both literal and figurative), but this lecture shows that one can be an orthodox Calvinist and disagree with the twenty-four-hour-days interpretation for purely historical-grammatical reasons.

posted by Jeremy at 6:11 PM
0 marginalia

Sunday, August 13, 2006

Of Jesus the True Serpent

When James Jordan came to Dayton last year, he spoke in one of his lectures of how we should see the serpent in the Garden of Eden as sent by God to disciple and instruct Adam and Eve in the principles of kingship, preparatory to their royal investiture as rulers of the lands outside the garden (this is why it is emphasized that the serpent is a beast of the field/land, as opposed to the garden, and why his distinguishing characteristic is the kingly property of subtlety/cunning/wisdom). When, in envy of mankind, the serpent deceived the man and woman, leading them to take of the fruit God had for a time witheld from them, he was in a twisted way fulfilling his God-given mission--he was sent to prepare the human couple to eat of the tree, and he did so in a hasty, rudimentary way, asking them legitimate, wisdom-encouraging questions, but framing them so as to mislead rather than instruct. Jordan furthermore asserted that God's promise that death would follow eating of the tree should not be seen as a threat, but a cryptic message of hope for a fuller existence. God gave the temporary prohibition against eating the fruit of the Tree of the Knowledge of Good and Evil immediately after putting Adam into a death-sleep, tearing him apart, and "resurrecting" him as a fuller creation: Man-and-Woman, the multipersonal self. Similarly, had Adam waited to eat of the fruit till God permitted it, he would have undergone another death-and-resurrection transformation, emerging as a fuller, more richly human being. When man stole the fruit, acquiring the gnosis (knowledge of good and evil) that it embodied, that knowledge became a curse to him. The death that should have lead to life was given a "sting," and it was made semi-permanent. God did invest him as a king, providing him with kingly raiment, but that raiment was stained with the blood of the creation he had violated by his disobedience. Man was sent out of the garden into the land, not as a wise steward-king, but as a bloodstained, manipulative tyrant.

I've recently had some additional thoughts about all of this, especially about the typology of the serpent. Ancient Israel was oft troubled by idolatry in the form of various fertility cults, worship of Baal (the male fertility god) and Ashtoreth (the mother-goddess). These complimentary deities, symbols of the masculine and feminine principles (yang and yin, respectively), are very often associated with serpents as cultic symbols; and in fact early forms of these deities often combine both principles into a single deity: the serpent-god. There are even highly suggestive Sumerian pictograms portraying the serpent-god coiled around a tree, and two figures, male and female, seated on either side of him (as it were, in the posture of students or disciples). Why did the principles of masculinity and femininity become so overwhelmingly associated with the serpent in pagan mythology? I think it has to do with the fact that when the serpent deceived Adam and Eve, he robbed them of their integrity, their glory, and, in a sense, their true identity. The serpent took these properties for himself, fulfilling for a time his prideful envy of man.

That is, until Christ appeared. Christ came as the True Adam, the true humanity, to win back for mankind the office that the first Adam had, by his disobedience, lost to the serpent. Additionally, it is interesting to note that Christ came not only as the True Man, but also as the True Serpent. The original serpent was meant to be man's instructor in the divine Wisdom prerequisite to partaking of the gnosis-tree; instead, he caused man's relationship to gnosis to become deeply twisted and corrupt, devoid of Wisdom. Christ came and gave us another Tree, the Cross, the sublime mystery of which far surpasses the tepid pseudo-gnosis of the Gnostics, more Zen-like in its paradox than any Buddhist koan. And he did so by becoming a different kind of Serpent: one like that which Moses lifted up in the wilderness, a healing Serpent who mediated the tree-gnosis by eating of the "fruit" of that tree himself, undergoing the death it entailed (a death fallen man could no longer safely endure), being resurrected as a Spiritual Man, and enabling all mankind to reap the benefits.

posted by Jeremy at 3:03 PM
6 marginalia

Friday, August 04, 2006

Of Books Redux

I am as yet untagged. Nevertheless:

1. One book that changed your life: Orthodoxy, G. K. Chesterton
2. One book that you've read more than once: The Histories, Herodotus
3. One book you'd want on a desert island: Collected Fictions, Jorge Luis Borges
4. One book that made you laugh: Good Omens, Neil Gaiman & Terry Pratchett
5. One book that made you cry: Collected Poems, Wendell Berry
6. One book that you wish had been written: Biblical Hermeneutics and Typology, Jesus of Nazareth
7. One book that you wish had never been written: In His Steps, Charles M. Sheldon
8. One book you're currently reading: Chaos: Making a New Science, James Gleick
9. One book you've been meaning to read: The Brothers Karamazov, Fyodor Dostoevsky
10. Now tag five people: Jenny, Joy, Mark, Jared, Kristin.

posted by Jeremy at 1:37 PM
1 marginalia

Thursday, August 03, 2006

Of Books

I went to Half Price Books yesterday, and bought the following:

I said consummate arts secrets...CONSUMMATE!!! Geez, guy wouldn't know majesty if it bit him in the face...

posted by Jeremy at 8:29 PM
0 marginalia